J.B. Manas

Official website for thriller author J.B. Manas

  • About J.B. Manas
  • The Mirror Man
  • Atticus
  • The Kronos Interference
  • News
  • Mailing List
  • Contact

Book and Movie Genres: How Well Do They Line Up?

June 23, 2018 by J.B. Manas Leave a Comment

I’ve eagerlybooks_to_film watched and enjoyed many of the blockbuster films this year, including Infinity War, Solo, Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom, and others. Still haven’t seen Deadpool 2 yet, but it’s on my list! I’ve also been watching Westworld and enjoying its complexity while I suffer the long wait till Game of Thrones returns in 2019 (and even longer wait for Winds of Winter).

It occurred to me as I examine book genre trends in the sci-fi and fantasy areas, that the popular trends in books vs. movies/tv tend to differ in subtle ways.

In film and TV, genre-blending stories are as popular as ever: e.g., superhero thrillers that span earth, space, and sea; blockbuster monster films (Skull Island, Jurassic World, etc.); technothrillers like Westworld, horror/sci-fi blends like Stranger Things, and so on.

In literature, at least in the sci-fi and fantasy world, sticking closely to a sub-genre and observing its tropes (while still aiming for a unique story) is the norm, with more defined borders around each sub-genre. Currently, space opera, urban fantasy, cyberpunk, and military sci-fi are all doing well.  It’s harder to gain visibility in a crowded genre like action-adventure, for example, unless it’s a killer concept or an already popular author. And if a story spans multiple genres, it’s even harder, because the bookstores don’t know where to place it (and readers aren’t quite sure what to expect). This is why publishers always have the same battle cry, “Give me the same, but different.”

Psychological thrillers/mysteries are big in both film and literature, and in fact, many such novels are made into movies  (e.g., Gone Girl; Girl on a Train; Woman in the Window; The Marsh King’s Daughter; Girl with the Dragon Tattoo; just to name a few). Oddly enough, most books in this genre are traditionally published, while the sci-fi arena includes a good portion of indie books.

One thing is certain. A story with great characters, a compelling premise, and a killer logline will have a much better chance of finding an audience in any arena. In the book world, if it’s an easily identifiable sub-genre, all the better.

As a writer, these are the things I tend to ponder as I plan a new book series. Either way, for me, the story comes first. If it doesn’t appeal to me or offer a set of characters I want to spend a lot of time with, it doesn’t matter what genre it is. But more on that later!

Filed Under: amwriting, Movies, sci-fi, thriller Tagged With: AmWriting, Movies and TV Shows, Storytelling, WritersLife

Battle of the Bastards: Anatomy of a Villain

January 23, 2017 by J.B. Manas Leave a Comment

Ramsay and JoffreyA question on a writers’ forum got me thinking about villains again. Particularly: What makes a good villain?

A quick look at Game of Thrones serves up some perfect examples. For anyone who has watched the show, it would be hard to argue that Joffrey Baratheon and Ramsay Bolton aren’t two of the most hated villains in television history. And Cersei Lannister has been running pretty close, though arguably with slightly more sympathetic traits.

What makes them so hated?

For a hint at the answer, let’s look at another popular series, this time in the movies: Harry Potter. This series, too, has one of the most hated villains of all time. And no, I’m not talking about Voldemort. I’m talking about Dolores Umbridge, who even overshadows “he who shall not be named,” not an easy feat.

Why is this? What makes Joffrey Baratheon, Ramsay Bolton, Cersei Lannister, and Dolores Umbridge so darn hateworthy? Sure, they do bad things to those we like, but is that it? Not really. Others also do bad things to those we like, but we don’t necessarily hate them.

I would argue that, paradoxically, what makes a strong villain is weakness.

Yes, you heard that right.

Think about it. All four villains I mentioned have no significant strength of any kind. One strong person could arguably defeat all four together in a fight within 30 seconds. But each of them is exceedingly powerful and difficult to defeat.

These devious weaklings abuse their power, they foil things for the heroes, they come across as “bigger than their britches,” they often achieve their positions unjustly, and they annoyingly get away with their actions in sneaky, calculating ways. And of course, they do bad things to people we like, sometimes smiling as they do it.

It’s the same with Doug Stamper in House of Cards, possibly the most hated character on the show. Or President Snow in The Hunger Games. Or the kid, Olly, on Game of Thrones. None of them have any particular power, but they’re put in positions of advantage that they exploit to the hilt.

There are exceptions, of course, but by and large, many of the most hated villains are weaklings with an unfair advantage and a lack of empathy.

Just a Pinch of Sympathy and Humor

Of course, just as a little salt can help a recipe but too much can destroy it, a few sympathetic traits, minor backstory elements, and even humor, can add depth to such characters. But too much, and you risk making the villains likeable or sympathetic, which isn’t a bad thing in itself, but may not generate the hatred you want for them. It’s more an art than a science—a constant balancing act.

What About That Battle?

Speaking of the “Battle of the Bastards” in Game of Thrones, from which this post gets its title, think about that particular battle. Ramsay Bolton (the villain) vs. Jon Snow (the hero), both allegedly born out of wedlock.

What makes them different? Both were ostracized to varying degrees because of their lineage. But they couldn’t be further apart in terms of their outlook on life.

I believe what separates the villains from the heroes are three things: the choices they make, how they choose to let their past impact them, and their general nature. For the writers out there, these are all things to think about as you craft your villains. And for fans, think about your most hated (or most liked) villains and what makes them so.

I’d love to hear from you all as to who your favorite villains are and why?


If you’re enjoying this blog, don’t forget to sign up for the mailing list here, for blog updates and exclusive content via email.

#amwriting #screenwriting #GameofThrones

Filed Under: amwriting, GameofThrones, screenwriting Tagged With: AmWriting, Storytelling, writingtips

Empathy – An Essential Trait for Writers

November 22, 2016 by J.B. Manas Leave a Comment

Hemingway on EmpathyIt’s occurred to me that the singular trait that a writer needs above all is empathy: the ability to put yourself into the heads of your characters AND your readers, and really understand them.

Understanding Your Characters

Here’s what empathy feels like.

Your character is facing a given situation or entering into an environment. You’re writing from his/her POV (point of view).

When writing a scene, don’t think about how you would react or what you would be thinking. Think about how your characters would react, and what they’d be feeling, given their background and perspective.

Focus on their observations and attitudes about what they’re seeing and experiencing, not just the “authorly” description of the environment. In fact, remove your voice and opinions entirely and insert your POV character’s perspective. Also keep in mind how other characters in the scene would react individually. Just beware of head-hopping. Stay inside your POV character’s head the whole time, and only describe what others are doing/feeling through your POV character’s observations.

Think of it this way. Every character is a product of their environment; their upbringing; their genetic makeup; their history; their culture; their natural strengths and weaknesses; their past trials and tribulations; and a hundred other variables. And each of your characters may not only react uniquely, but may conflict with one another. In fact, it’s great if they do. Half the battle is creating a group of offsetting characters that are assembled for built-in conflict (it’s what makes every sitcom so great).

Empathy is the ability to understand all this, and to put yourself in their shoes, with their eyes, and with their history, even if that history isn’t included in the book.

Even villains are deserving of empathy. As the adage goes, every villain is the hero in their own mind. As a writer, it’s key to understand and appreciate that, and offer hints of that to the reader.

Speaking of readers, it’s just as important to understand them as it is to understand your characters.

Understanding Your Readers

As a writer, you’re also a marketer, which means understanding the trends and reader demographics for your genre. And as every marketing professional knows, it helps to know who your target audience is, their general preferences, and how they might react favorably or unfavorably toward a character or situation. In other words, as you’re writing, you should always be thinking of how you want the reader to feel during that scene.

To this end, it’s imperative to understand the principles of surprise, suspense, and conflict, and how people react to each.

Alfred Hitchcock was a master at this, often stating that, above all, he focused on what he wanted the audience to feel at any given time. Plot and pacing were always in support of the journey he wanted to take his audience on. For example, in Vertigo, he went against common practice to reveal a big secret to the audience BEFORE the ending (and, more importantly, before the protagonist knew), so they would be in suspense wondering if the protagonist would catch on or not.

Hitchcock also spoke frequently of surprise and suspense, often using a tableside discussion analogy. It goes something like this:

Two people are sitting at a table, talking. A bomb goes off. That’s surprise.

Two people are sitting at a table, talking. The bomb doesn’t go off (though the audience knows it’s there). That’s suspense.

Hitchcock’s point was that surprise lasts for a few seconds, while suspense can keep an audience glued for quite a bit of time. The two parties at the table could be having the most mundane conversation, and it would still be exciting.

Of course, that’s about the only time it’s okay to have a mundane conversation between characters. Aside from that, characters should rarely be in agreement. A key lesson here is: Turn conversations into arguments or debates. Your readers will thank you.

The bottom line here is that empathy, the ability to understand others and put yourself in their shoes (especially your characters and your readers), will take you far–in writing and in life.

#amwriting #writerslife #writingtips

Filed Under: amwriting, writerslife, writingtips Tagged With: AmWriting, WritersLife, writingtips

Connect On Social Media

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter

© 2023 · J.B. Manas · Built on the Genesis Framework